Well, yeah, but isn't it a lot more than 150-fold? That multiple times the original $12.5-million that Sequoia invested in Google produces 'only' (I use that term advisedly in the context) $1.88-billion. Given that Sequoia held 23.9-million shares at the Google offering, to get the above-mentioned figure they would have to sell all their shares for an average price of $78.60. Howzat, given that Google never sold for that low of a price ever post-IPO? And more importantly, Sequoia did much of its distributions this year at way-way higher prices.
By my math Sequoia's Google gains were closer to 500x than 150x. Is there something going on here that I'm missing?"
No comments:
Post a Comment